For quite some time now I have been studying the world of religion as an academic discipline, though of course I can't help but experience it as a
    religious person, too. Exploring religion in the first context, you read a lot about people's thoughts on love and, especially, their Love of God.
    Sometimes it is an exposition of the heart; a treatise of deeply moving sentiment from the pen of a mystic enraptured, a devotee awestruck, or a
    layperson awakened. Other times it is a treatise clearly attempting to tread ever-closer to the beacon of truth sprouting from the philosopher's
    stone--a Grecian thinker hoping to capture "goodness" and thus "God-liness," or perhaps a modern scholar loquaciously hoping to make
    empirical sense of faith. To me, it has always been paradoxical that the study of something so beyond categorization should fall prey to such a
    gluttony of words. Yet the truth is that reading about the love of others' invariably becomes a meditation on my own, producing ever more words
    about an Essence I can never hope to capture; and, now, it is in the space of that conundrum that I have been led to the thoughts and feelings I
    hope to share here.

    For, it is my intention to focus on the very fact of this "categorization," a streamlining of what the "experience of God" is. I know what it is for me;
    and as I've said, I've read a lot about what it is, or for that matter is not, for other people. And it has dawned on me that in all of these instances,
    and in fact so much of the way we experience religion is intent solely on expressing God to Me. It is all personal impressions, personal
    expressions, which of course are extraordinarily important. They maintain our sense of connectedness and indeed it is they, as in the prophetic
    tradition that are the very cornerstone that have allowed for many religions' growth and ability to touch lives and inspire souls.

    It appears, however, that in focusing so resolutely on our Love of God, our pondering, our searching, and our community's collective seeking, we
    somehow forget God's Love of Us. Allow me to explain: as is obvious in an age of immediate and vast swathes of information, people's
    impressions of The Infinite occupy many guises. I am sure most feel resolutely committed to their mode of loving, the shape of their faith if you will.
    Yet can we truly imagine that God's love of us is as singular as our own is for It? Though we may reach out to God in a particular, if not an
    individual way, how can we forget that God is much beyond the categories that we ourselves have created; indeed, God participated in the
    fashioning of them all. The Divine assumes the ability to see us, and Love us, in ways and means far beyond not only our own understanding, but
    also our own instituted mechanisms of connecting with It. We may Love God with all the might our heart can muster, and adopted or embraced a
    lens, a faith, a religion, a tradition, a path through which to begin to fathom the awesome splendor of The Divine, but we should not discern that
    because we have been able to embrace just one course, that God's Heart too occupies a single route down to dwell within and among us.

    In the world of today and the world of the past, politics has remained a hindrance to remembering, in a sense, that our humanity and its
    propensity to dwell in the finitude of the singular, masks the infinitude and diversity of God and God's Love.  We take ownership of and claim
    superiority in land, and likewise in the vital connection we, and our specific singular communities, have cultivated with The Infinite. We juxtapose
    this to others' claims of ownership, and find ourselves in a war of egos--living in total ignorance of the memory that each of our personal paths,
    each of our faiths, each of our traditions is a gift from the same well that extends far beyond a clash of convictions.

    The endeavor to cultivate and realize peace and tolerance amongst nations--weather demarcated by region, by history, by religion, or sometimes
    by all of these--is not an issue that can be easily classified as either "liberal" or "conservative" as is so often assumed. These ideals are not
    meant to function on the political plane though in our secularized world they are often relegated to the ranks of political strategy, plan, and
    ideology. Because the simplicity of terms like liberal and conservative does not capture the complexity of the peoples and fates encompassed in
    the aim for peace and tolerance--for truly, it is all of us. In some way, to focus once again on categories (i.e. liberal/ conservative), and allow their
    ideological offspring to be the starting point for "meeting one another" in peace, is no real quest for that intention at all. Peace between religions
    is construed in actually finding one another with a recognition of the Greatness, the Vastness, and Universality of The Divine Heart. It is simply up
    to us to recognize our pre-existent brotherhood as many souls on many paths to a singular source. Indeed it is here, when we give into an
    appreciation of another's creed, and an appreciate of another's Love for God, that we give in to the richness of God's Own Love.




    photo credit: www.interfaithresources.com
Amaany
MAGAZINE
A Heart for Many Faiths
Sephora Matzner
    Sephora Matzner grew up in Los Angeles as a Reform Jew and studied Religion at UC Berkeley. She now lives with her husband-to-be in
    Cambridge, MA where she will be continuing her study of Religion at the Harvard Divinity School in the Fall.
Send your comments and questions regarding this article to: interfaith@amaany.org.
Copyright © 2008 AMAANY Magazine, All Rights Reserved